After the fire is often disputed: who was responsible for the fire? Whoever for coming up for the damage? Apartment owners are quickly getting a fire before nothing. Then is often disputed: who was responsible for the fire? Whoever for coming up for the damage? Dishes at good legal representation can be surprisingly forgiving when assessing fire caused through negligence. A District Court has apologised for example a young man who had caused a room fire by burning an advent wreath (AZ: 10 O 141/98). He could prove the serious intention by the already launched coffee machine, prepare a romantic breakfast by lighting of the advent wreath. His girlfriend he was involved but when attempting to wake up in a lovemaking: Meanwhile the apartment burned down. The Court’s opinion it could not also require that by a young man.
The influence of physical stimuli is therefore unpredictable. The insurance had to advocate in this case the Court considers the damage. Also a the marriage dispute forgotten Christmas tree or an accidental bump to burning candles can not interfere with often the insurance obligation. The victim lives can come up to rent the fire insurance of the building for the renovation of the apartment. But only if the tenant did not cause the damage.
Generally, the landlord must not arise for the damage to the property of the lessee. Here, only the own contents insurance can help. The own apartment has become uninhabitable, the lessee is also entitled to reduce the rent to zero, if he did not cause the fire damage. In any case you should seek a legal consultation with major damage. Blame in causing of fires is often a question case – and good legal representation. Just because fires usually high damage, is consulting with a lawyer involved in the insurance law.
But it is often dull, because the alleged shortcomings are by far not always capable of reduction. Author Thomas Trepnau shows in his book the secret of the damp wall reduction in rent as landlords protect themselves against rent reductions. Regensburg. Increasingly see faced claim to have discovered defects or errors on the leased tenant landlords with rent reductions and therefore reduce the rent. But not every housing shortage shall be entitled to the reduction in rent. , so Thomas Trepnau. Stephen M. Ross brings even more insight to the discussion. The author, whose expert rat has helped already several hundred rental companies, shows in his book, what precautions can be taken to avoid rent reductions.
So, the tenants Association in the blank is already running at conclusion of the contract and the course provided the definition of the transfer protocol. Pitfalls can be avoided easily. Victims of a rent reduction claim for every landlord can significantly reduce the risk\”, so Thomas Trepnau, otherwise, can eat a rent reduction up to 100% of the rent.\” How Landlords protect themselves, so the author is described in his book. Follow simply just step by step of what there is. All you need to do.\” Shall be reduced by what percentage? There are no generally applicable rules on the amount of the reduction in rent. She must be reasonable. The more the lack of affect, the more the tenant can shorten the rent. The so-called Hamburg table provides a clue to the calculation of the amount of the reduction in rent\”.
It is for each room in the apartment set, which expresses the value of housing as a percentage. This table is part of the book. Rent reduction table is a brothel in the House, can be reduced up to 30%. The living room can be only an average 15 degrees Celsius heat, 30% are rent reduction possible. The heating fails completely during the heating season, so rent reductions are possible even up to 100%.