Disagreement concerns scientists still two important issues – this is how it is valuable for science, and how dangerous? Because the value of the banner is that his code incorporated technologies of the future. Decoding of these codes now actively engaged in physics from NASA physicist Michael Dodzhenson (NASA): '… we do will depart from the dogma of the theory of algorithms, and develop new technology for processing and visual display of information (at least) that in the future, may even allow you to transfer huge amounts of information before it will be 'requested' by the user. This will dramatically increase the physical capacity of communication channels and much more … 'But with such approach strongly disagree scientists who fear that is not always attempt to examine the complex and confusing phenomenon ends well and for the benefit of society (such as splitting the atom, which led to the creation of nuclear weapons) Professor Isaac Shamel (Israel): "…
In the black banner, undoubtedly laid the danger – do not know who and for what purpose it has created. And even the opportunity to learn new technologies can not justify the potential threat … "With these cautious and skeptical scientists nominated by various versions of its origin – in particular, and a version of his 'alien' nature – as a conscious (extraterrestrial beings) and natural (the nature of the cosmos). About it in the next article.