However, only a few of the planned hotels for the opening championship will be commissioned on time. Does this mean that the provision of settlement tourists Government will be forced to allocate additional state funds? Or, perhaps, intended to break the power of tents, similar to the organized Trukhanov island during the Kiev "Eurovision"? Muddy Ukrainian reality "market economy" Recently the Ukrainian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (USPP), Ukrainian Agrarian Confederation and the Ukrainian Grain Association sent President and Prime Minister of an open letter asking to resolve the situation on the grain market. The concern of businessmen led government intervention in the regulation of prices on grain markets and the creation of anti-competitive conditions. The applicants argue that the market for a new monopoly – the company "Bread Investbud", which received the largest quotas on grain exports and other great benefits. According to some media for this company are close to the President of the businessmen and the Russian capital. Dell is likely to agree. Another illustrative example of the opacity of the government's actions was the sale of state monopoly in telecommunications – "Ukrtelecom". The new owner was the "Yeosu" subsidiary of the Austrian financial and investment group EPIC, received the "Ukrtelecom" in the property for 10.575 bln.
(1.13 billion dollars. U.S.). No one knows the company "Yeosu," was the only bidder, which gave opposition and the media presumption that "Ukrtelecom" sold structures close to the President. In addition, recently the chairman of the State Property Fund of Ukraine Alexander Ryabchenko said that in 2010-2014.
Home best protection against rising rents and first-class retirement plans with the planned price brake to prevent the grand coalition that the housing and life in the large German cities is now nearly priceless. But if the political aim of limiting the extent and pace of future increases, can be achieved, seems questionable. In particular, families with average incomes can protect against further dramatic increases only with the acquisition of residential property, says Jurgen Dawo, founder of town & country house, Germany Massivhaus leader, in an interview. The legislature wants to limit the amount of rent at first and new rental. Comparable to apply to Mietanhebungen when current leases. Are families with average incomes can afford in the future neither the living and life in major cities? Jurgen Dawo: At least the political will is there to prevent the seemingly relentless rise in rents in major German cities.
Whether by the Grand Coalition adopted rent brake is the suitable instrument, must still turn out. Some housing experts doubt it anyway. The experience teaches that Government interventions of this kind almost always miss or as in tax law open up new design possibilities, contrary to run the political intent. Reach even the opposite of what is intended. Because the coalition agreement contains naturally only the fundamental cornerstones, we will have to wait what looks in a few months the legal implementation. They said just that government intervention often do the opposite of what is intended. What do you mean with regard to the planned rent brake? Jurgen Dawo: I’m afraid with this opinion I am by the way not only that the rent brake is a brake on investment. This particularly affordable housing in the big cities would increase still scarce, therefore the rents further tangible. At the same time, looking at that cheaper housing is dedicated to and no longer bezahbar for normal income earners increasingly becoming comparatively expensive condominiums.
'In 1980 my parents had 4 room apartment (I, my parents, brother and sister), brother and sister received their apartment in 1986,' It's a quote from one site. Tell me, now you or someone in your family got an apartment? Yes they are there, but they stood on stage with the 80's! And the state offers you an apartment? I think not! What can you say for the price of real estate? That's not a great example: 42 378 rub. for KM You can afford it?? I'm sure not!! Here is another example: In my area the average salary of 8,000 rubles a studio apartment a million !!!!! Ie, that would buy me an apartment I need to work seven days a week plus a year, not what is not and would not pay!! And that was in the 80s? You uchishsya free, you go to work, give the apartment and all! Life is good !!!!! Where to watch our government ??!!! They offer us to learn, but for school lomyat mad 'pasterns'! And even if you manage to learn, you will not get a job without experience !!!!! And what? So I currently am a lawyer and I am confident that I can not work more than in the office of the court! over 5,500 rub.v mesyats.I how many I can buy an apartment? These 5,500 I need to buy a eat, dress very least, is 300-400!! Well of course you can say the same people live not in themselves nothing, and refused to buy an apartment and a mustache does not blow …. And what do you think they are just living from paycheck to paycheck as we are? No! It those people who are in collapse of the USSR managed to capture the 'plum cake' Well deti.Ostalnye or those who steal or have any in the state! And what comes out, my dear? The state steals from us, and we steal from the state-demon limit! But there is another option. The government cries-MORTGAGE! So what? My friend took this mortgage, and now she has a studio apartment in Lyubertsy, but she can not quit your job for 40 years! And in her apartment not propishut not yet pay the debt to the bank … great?? Yeah me the same 'love'! I spoke with many people and small meet someone who is happy with our government. So what? They all are silent thrust, excuse me 'tongue in the ass'! We are all together vote for the uncle of 'Just Rossii'A where is she your equity? I'll tell you-'U pocket! " So that the people I'll tell you, 'If you want housing, steal! 'It teaches us to state.